Anurag Agrawal
30th March, 2016
The book is set in AD 2350, 334 years ahead of
us in 2016 and 418 years ahead of when it was written in 1932. The world now a
utopia (or a dystopia- depends on your viewpoint), is based on the principle of
having a stable society by controlling how people think.
Another famous fiction "1984" by
George Orwell focused on a similar control philosophy, but used totalitarian
control, fear of repercussions from deviant behavior to bring people into line.
The brave new world whereas, approaches the
problem from another angle, using pleasure to achieve this stability. Giving
people a lot of tools like soma (An aphrodisiac (much like a drug) on
consumption of which you would get sensual gratification without
repercussions), free boundless sex, perfumes, un-aging vitality, cleanliness,
keeping them so distracted, that they do not have the time to think about
anything else. Removing any individualistic thought. The ultimate goal is to
have a society which can be easily controlled- restrained - managed so as to
increase consumption of goods and services. While, pleasure is one of the tools
employed to keep people happy, the society of AD 2350 has gone a step ahead and
is conditioning children from when they are infants, to think and talk like
they want them to. An example of one of key phrases used for molding the minds
-" Ending is better than mending, the more the stitches, the less
riches!" The family system has been completely abolished, children do not
have parents. Everyone is born out of test tubes, with a special class system
in place to determine - the intelligent ones, medium intelligence, functional
jobs, versus a menial worker. Everyone's destiny is pre-determined, bred for
specific roles. So, a menial worker would be given less nutrition, during the
developmental phases, to reduce the brains functionality! A person destined to
work in a low gravity environment, would be so conditioned in their growing
years that they are actually really happy only when they are in a low gravity
environment! Everyone belongs to everyone! Is another philosophy that is
prevalent at the time. There is no marriage; fidelity is actually frowned down
upon! If you spend too much time with a single male/female, you would attract
negative attention with the probability of being sent to a correctional center.
Children are encouraged from a very young age to explore themselves and their
partners an example of what is termed as erotic play! Calling men/women as
Fathers/Mothers are used as cuss words!
It’s astonishing, how a lot of these concepts
are actually coming true in our time. Yes, I agree, at a much slower pace, but
definitely happening. Think about it, people increasingly prefer to exchange
old phones for new ones instead of getting them repaired. There are practical
examples in place, where scientists could genetically engineer the right parts
of the brain, resulting in a more intelligent human! Sexual Promiscuity in
children is increasing day by day. If you watch cartoons these days, there are
sexual connotations thrown about very casually. Infidelity in partners is
increasingly common place, especially in places like the US, where family
systems are fast deteriorating. Sitcoms like "Two and Half men",
"Couplings" are gradually making it seem acceptable to be fooling
around with as many partners as you want!
You would think, India is too conservative a
nation to have any such behaviors out in the open! But you would be surprised
by the content the television sets are spouting these days! Serials like
"Bhabiji Ghar par hain" are getting increasingly popular amongst the
masses. While, these visual fantasies may not have translated into behavioral
characteristics as yet, believe me, let another decade pass, and you yourself
may consider it normal! That's how propaganda works. Advertisements, Social
media, etc., keep trumpeting a single message in different forms, and we
unknowingly start accepting it.
Now this may seem a little fantastical to you,
but that is how this sub conscious advocacy works. You don’t even realize you
have succumbed.
Take an example- who in their right minds,
would be willing to spend as much as 50, 60, 70, 80 even 90,000 Rs on a single
mobile phone. That is not the end of it. You are willing to shell a similar or
a higher amount of money for the same phone a year later, with a minuscule
difference to what you already own. The ironic part is, you actually don’t
require this new tool that the phone company has come up with.
All this is made possible by, a diva with
looks comparable to a roman goddess, the epitome of what you always wanted to
be or be with, a hunk of man, with chiseled pectorals smiling his shiny teeth
posing with the newest variant of the phone, willing you, the viewer to
believe, how complete their lives are now, and you the viewer could be in a
similar position by just paying an x amount of money.
There is behavioral research being undertaken to
study how the human brain reacts to different aspects. Say, if people react
better to the word "pleasant" in comparison to say
"pleasing", that is what the advertisers would use. Does the section
of the society you are targeting the product too, like blonde models better or
brunettes? Is dark skinned preferred or light skinned? Every aspect of what we
see, is being engineered to be more acceptable to us. What’s more, it’s
increasingly hard to ignore these calls for your attention- they are
everywhere- blaring away at your TV Screen, Pop up's on your Internet browsers,
Notifications on your mobile phones from online marketplaces, hoardings on
flyovers.
You may be inclined to think, this works with
only the rich, with enough money to spare for such superfluous needs, but you
would be wrong. Ignoring the poor class, would be ignoring a market with
incredible potential, especially since they make up for a majority of the
population. So, what do corporations do, they come up with different low priced
variants of goods for the poor. "Even you can be cool!"- is the
undercurrent of the messages the corporations are trying to communicate.
The effect that these messages have on the
human thought process is that, without realizing it, we start taking an idea
for granted, just because it is the zeitgeist currently (popular thought
prevalent today). Say, keep showing an advertisement that wearing clothes
made from plastic is more comfortable and cooler than clothes made from cotton,
and there you have it, after some suitable repetitions for a period of time
from two or three different sources, the idea will take hold. After a time,
people aware of the phenomena would wonder, if a product they are attracted
towards, is really something they want, or are being subtly being nudged into
buying, just because the corporations know, all the right buttons to push.
The society we live in, has progressed into a
structure where, respect and social standing is determined by your possessions.
Ahhhhhh...this guy owns an iPhone 6s, the latest one, the immediate reaction is
that of - wow, with a slight twinge of jealousy. Now compare this to a guy
owning an old Nokia. Not your thought process?
Alright then-
Think of the US president- what if the guy is
seen using an old Nokia instead of the latest iPhone, or Samsung. What would
your impression be? Is he any less the man he was before you knew his phone's
model?
Now a counter argument may be that this is
more prevalent in the younger generation.....the youth.....the 15 to 35's.(The
1995's and the 2000's born)........But think of this, this youth is actually
going to take over the reins very soon- The youth which has been brought up on
ideals of consumerism bliss.....constant commercials of the latest chocolates,
the latest video games, the latest sport wear, the latest pencil boxes, the
latest milk drinks- Horlicks, Bournvita.....ahh...a new improved
version....with 40% more DHA......ahh.......another improved product, has been
known to improve child's brain concentration by another 20%, oh another
upgrade, known to improve memory by 90%.....Do we seriously believe all this
conditioning is just going to fade away!....
An example-
Q. Do you think smoking is bad for health?
Q. It is an established fact that women who smoke,
have more complicated pregnancies. A much higher rate of children born with
deformities....Agreed?
Now how do you think our perception of women
smoking has changed over the last 10 years? Is it becoming more acceptable? I
know, it would depend on your social clique, but generally how do you think our
perception has changed. (Now I am not being a feminist, I think men smoking I
uncool too.....)
Most would agree with me that this has
gradually started becoming acceptable, or at least, less frowned upon! Give it
some more time, do you think it would get all the more acceptable?
How do you think this has come about? We who
were born into conservative families, how did this change of heart occur? - The
answer is, the constant subtle notions being fed to us by all sorts of visual
and audio media. Humans are like parrots. There are very few new ideas that
people come up with. A single idea or a thought takes hold of the society's
mood, and is repeated by each section of the society. Starting with the liberals,
who take up the theme and immediately take the role of the oppressed. Of how
their idea has been looked down upon for ages. Gradually, this becomes
mainstream, with the masses unable to out rightly speak against the idea,
because by now, the popular thought is that of the liberals. Accompanying this,
is the constant tirade of advertisements, which to be in the limelight, and to
be thought of as cool and thus sell more products, use the idea to garner
attention, thus further increasing popularity of the idea. Slowly it percolates
down to each corner of the society till most people believe it to be true! And
say you ask a person the reason for this unfaltering acceptance after a
suitable period of time. The person would answer, because most other people think
so too!
We are being molded by corporations, looking
to eke every single dime from our pockets.......there are consumer studies in
place.....all of it meant to slice us and dice us...to break us up in to
different markets.......ah........a durable diaper for the
masses.....ah...a diaper with 10hrs protection, another with 14hrs protection,
one for the night, one for the day, .ah...ah an elite diaper for that extra
touch for babies (Think this is ridiculous? see pampers premium care)
Think schools........there are a band of
different schools, the elites---willing to pay 10 times the salary of a common
man for child's education in a single month, then the middle man's school, who
doesn’t want his/her child to study with the lower classes, but wants the child
to get the treatment of elite, the lower class schools........A guilt
business....And think! Most of these schools follow a similar curriculum....the
CBSE or the ISCE
AND WE HAVE BEEN WILLING TO BE A PART OF
THIS....Firstly most of the masses remain unaware of such a shift and end up
easily fitting into brackets they are being placed into....acting all prim and
proper as they are expected to.....while others...who are aware...do nothing
about it....bound by the compulsion of being in line with the current social
structure.
I concede that my ramblings may have been
incoherent for most of the times, and thus I will try to condense my synopsis
further!
We may not be at a stage yet, where children
are being born for specific purposes, like a nut to fit a bolt, but we have
definitely started responding to conditioning via popular thought. And the
current popular theme is consumerism....You want to be a part of
society....consume......you want to pay lower taxes.....get a home loan....but
consume....
You may be wondering after all this, what my
point is? The bitter truth? I don’t know. Is all that is happening right? Is
there a right or wrong.......would it be better if humans are left alone to
their own devices? Is there a negative result of suppressing or influencing
independent human thought?
I don’t know.
Nicely written Anurag
ReplyDeleteManish Nair-
ReplyDeleteHi Anurag, tried posting a comment on ur blog, but in vain. So, using this "group network".(Sorry every1, this is a bit boring..so kindly skip😆)
It's clear that you need our encouragement to keep up the good work. First of all: it held my attention (well, since i had to eventually comment😉)..
Mr. huxley's fears stemmed from his deeprooted underpinning in darwinism and his almost "negative utopian" outlook towards technical development vis a vis social degeneration. I would dare not say, that his fears were completely unfounded (with still many more decades to go)... You have streamlined your views on consumerism with succint examples which to an extent are compelling. But an outright rejection of scope for moral change in humans or a retrieval of cultural ethos which could stand as the last bulwark against rampant consumerism is unjustified. A change is inevitable. And an absolute suppression of independent thought isn't easily possible...specially when we have digital access with wide ranging disparities/gaps for sure.Every generation has redefined social structures and tried to align with the living standards of their time. It's difficult to say we are more consumerist today...when the tv was introduced..most of our old folks who knew about it wanted the best...or take the counter culture movement of the 60's..getting "stoned" was a consumeristic feeling...a basic demand with a capacity to procure. Can't deny a human something, if he/she can afford. And with that i feel, consumerism affects only a strata of indian society and a holistic comparison with the west will be highly pretentious. Behavioural conditioning will reinvent itself, till we stiffle the freedom of unchecked advertising or bring about a massive change in the identity chaos that lingers perpetually within the changing demographic dividend here. There is a socio-economic-political angle to sponsoring consumerism. And the stakeholders have deep pockets and imperialistic urges. That's to it, just my humble observation. You should'nt end it with an "I dont know"... it's very unsettling man, to read the whole essay and feeling outrightly stupid.😝. End with a conviction.
Hi Manish,
ReplyDeleteThanks again for replying.There has been a lot of discussion around what would our future would look like by esteemed writers such as Huxley, Orwell, Margaret Atwood etc. One of the major themes of these books is the question of free choice.
While the very fundamentals of consumerism are based on free will, is it really existent today? My thoughts in my piece revolve around this issue. A typical consumerist ecology would be a place where the consumer would get the choice to select/buy products he/she chooses to buy at the persons free will. But haven’t the boundaries transcended since then? Where does free choice stop and suggestive nudging start? That is my problem. Unknowing to the consumer, corporations are using methods & techniques (I have already discussed some in my blog) to nudge the customer into buying products. That is not free choice. Wants are being created, regardless of needs.
Now you say that there is still hope of moral change in humans or a retrieval of culture which could stand as a bulwark against rampant consumerism?
This is quite a grand statement, and I would love for it to be true, but how do you see this translate into practical actions?
If this would have been a problem that was identifiable by the consumer and was actively watching out for it, I could agree that, yes we can change. But how do you fight against an invisible enemy. How do you fight against yourself, because that is what conditioning does to you, happily consuming everything being offered, under the guise of having choices amongst products. How do you not like, or dull the need to buy something, which your mind loves. A philanthropic organization conducted a research and found that people who are touching rough surfaces, or surfaces which cause slight discomfort while listening to or reading demands for a donation, are more likely to be empathize with the cause rather than a person in contact with a smooth surface. Do you think, the mass would know this? How do you fight against this? So the next time, a person opens a letter made of sandstone paper demanding money for a new cause, the person is more likely to write a cheque, unknowing that the corporation has manipulated him/her into making a donation.
Another way the risk of consumerism’s spread could have been mitigated was active participation by governments. But, what do we have here? The governments are actually party to all this. A democracy needs its people to be happy, and what easier way is there than giving the illusion of happiness. Elected governments need money to be elected and to operate, which had led to pro capitalistic policies over the last decade, and not showing any signs of letting up. (As for communist governments, well China has started its shift to a consumer driven one, while Russia struggles against an impending recession (some say, it’s already in it) and may open doors to more pro-consumerist policies in lieu of a bailout.)
The only way I can think of, is having a Klu Klux Klan kinds revolution, hanging dissenters at our will (Just joking off course).
When you say that, its difficult to quantify the measure of consumerist tendencies to compare the past to present---I agree. My point is that, these tendencies have been optimally tapped after the advent of TV’s, social media etc.,
I agree it would be pretentious to compare the Indian society holistically to a western one. But that’s not what I am talking about. It is undeniable that we are moving towards a more westernized outlook, (matter over mind…), a more indianized version of it, but definitely moving. And yes, consumerism is affecting only a strata of our society today. But that’s not to say, it can’t in future. In fact it is an “Untapped market” in corporate lingo. Why do you think everyone is going bonkers over Africa – a new place to sell products & services into?
Sorry about ending my piece so abruptly. I agree, it doesn’t make for good reading. If it would have been an essay for a school competition, I would have gone with a conviction and a way forward for this impending doom (or a happy future). But this is more of a heart felt piece, and the truth is I don’t know whether this situation we are in and progressing towards is good or bad.
ReplyDeletePeople are actually quite happy today- you have nice shiny cars, all the comfort in the world, TV sets- LED’s, LCD’s, Plasma TV’s, 3D TV’s, Elevator, Escalators…pretty much everything at finger tips.
If people do not realize that they are being coerced into doing something and are happy, would it be wrong? This is a more comfortable world, without a doubt. And the mass is unconcerned with how they are being manipulated, unless something happens that wrenches them out of their torpors. And this is where I draw the comparison with Huxley’s world of AD 2350. The next step to the current situation would be breeding children from embryo to adult, who would be happy with their fates, regardless of what it is really.
Extremely well written Anurag. It's scary how we are becoming slaves of consumerism without even realising it. And you're right it's not about rich or poor, it's everywhere. I heard a maid complaining that her 8 year daughter spends a rs200 data pack on phone in 2 days. Her predicament can be imagined. While she wants to provide for all the possible comforts for her daughter, she is unknowingly becoming a victim of the "idea"
ReplyDeleteAnurag, this is great piece I must say! I was always aware only about your avid reading. The first thing that came to my mind while I was reading the part was this movie, The Giver, you must have seen where in the making of a perfect world free from pain and extremes, they create a sort of lifeless world. The plot is similar to your description of the world.
ReplyDeleteThe part, where you mentioned about how society is becoming acceptable to things it was opposed to once upon a time. In simple words its exposure, once we are exposed to strange things on a regular basis, it ultimately accept it.
I feel before reaching that weird place, there will be a ‘U’ turn. At least I am hopeful!
Yup...bang on.....Consider a situation where a mouse is placed in a room with normal lighting. Now switch off the light entirely. Do you think the mouse would fidget, try to find a way out?
DeleteSituation two: Place the mouse in the same room, and gradually start dimming the lights over a period of time, till its completely dark. What would the mouse now do? Would it be more adjusted to darkness.
I believe we are in the second mouse trap situation..
But ya, like you said, history proves there is a cycle to this....rise and decline and so on..!